Usually I find myself passing over the Rosso di Montalcino wines in favor of the better (and more expensive) Brunello di Montalcinos but curiosity got the better of me and I bought two.

I assume the Rosso di Montalcino DOC was created to generate cash flow.  The wines come from the same vineyards as those that produce Brunello di Montalcino but they only need to age a minimum of 6 months (and oak is not a requirement).  Like the Brunello di Montalcino, Rosso di Montalcino is 100% Sangiovese.

When I first smelled the 2005 La Gerla, I got a big whiff of vitamins but it diminished over time and, after a few hours, it was hardly noticeable.  The wine has made in stainless steel.  For $22, it’s not bad.  It has nice balance and a lot of fruit (some funk) with decent tannins and decent finish.  It’s not very complex but, then again, it’s not a Brunello.

The other Rosso I had was the 2006 Bolsignano.  I really liked this wine.  The Bolsignano resembled a well-made Brunello.  The wine is made from 100% Sangiovese Grosso and I’m guessing that it’s seen some oak.

The wine is beautifully balanced with wonderful cherry, cedar, and mineral notes.  The med-length finish entices you to take another sip.  This is a wonderful food wine and, for $28, a real find.